JohnA lifeBlog

Documenting our hero’s attempt to conquer the mythical thing called “life”
  • rss
  • Home
  • About

Score No Points for the little people…

John Anderson | August 3, 2008

I wrote this letter to the gang at The Consumerist tonight:

Ok, so tonight, I went to the movies, and was confronted again by some low-level worker asking for ID when making a credit card purchase. I explained to the employee that the card was signed, and that was all that was necessary.

Suffice it to say that the employee and her not-legal-to-drink “manager” both said that I could not make the purchase without providing ID. I refused, and went into my movie leaving the overpriced popcorn and soda behind.

When I got home from the movies, I dutifully called the 800 number on the back of my MasterCard, and explained the situation to the rep on the other end. I asked that I be notified via mail that the merchant was indeed contacted about this issue, at which time I was placed on hold.

About 10 minutes later, a “supervisor” came on the phone, and I again explained the situation. She replied that it was their policy that they “preferred that merchants asked for photo ID”. I repiled that contractually, that was not the case. I further explained that since identity theft is so rampant, I refuse to show my ID unless legally required. She put me on hold, and then came back that her supervisor said the same thing, that it was a good thing(tm) that I wasn’t allowed to make my purchase without providing photo id.

Exasperated, I told the agent that I felt like I was having the same conversation I had at the movie theater verbatim, and that she should talk to her HR representative for proper training.

So, Consumerist friends, how on earth do we get these people to understand the very basic contracts that define the relationships between merchant and processor? How do we communicate to these people that we won’t risk identity theft to buy an overpriced bag of popcorn.

I’m off to fill out the MasterCard form on their website, but again, I feel defeated.

Any advice?

John

The bottom line is that merchants are REQUIRED to accept valid, signed cards regardless of the availability of photo ID. To those who say that it is for my protection, I would reply that since I am protected automatically from any invalid charges, it certainly is NOT for my protection.

Let’s see what MasterCard says. Oh, and consumerist.com won’t reply, it’s like writing an e-mail into a black hole.

Categories
Money, Movies, Politics
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« No Points Upgrades and such… »

2 responses

Call 1-800-300-3069 1 3 0 to do a telephone complaint

thelowpriceleader | August 5, 2008

Call 1-800-300-3069 1 3 0 to do a telephone complaint to MasterCard. I do this rather than using the online form.

To compain to Visa, call 1-800-Visa-911, 1 6 (card number)# and ask to file an incident report against a merchant for requiring ID. You will get people there sometimes who tell you the same thing your bank did when you called them.

You could also send an email to the movie chain’s corporate office.

I would suggest including the following evidence in your email:

The procedure to process a Visa transaction is shown here:
http://usa.visa.com/merchants/risk_management/card_present.html?it=c|/merchants/risk_management/index.html|Card-Present

The procedure outlined above states to swipe the card and obtain a signature and then verify the signature on the card against the signature on the receipt.

Also from Visa’s website, Visa’s rules below on Print Page 29 or PDF page 34 of this document: http://usa.visa.com/download/merchants/card_acceptance_guide.pdf state that merchants may not make identification a condition of sale.

MasterCard rules are similar.

Below is in regards to the MasterCard “Chargeback Guide” located at: http://www.mastercard.com/us/wce/PDF/TB_CB_Manual_5_08.pdf

Please read pages 76-78 of the “Chargeback Guide” which explain acceptance procedures and discuss when to call for authorization. Note that nowhere in the acceptance procedures does it say to ask for ID, and nowhere in the reasons to call for authorization does it say to do so when a cardholder refuses to provide ID.

Item 7 on page 77 discusses “unique transactions” and says that the merchant is to request identification for those transactions (excluding truck stop transactions). If you go to pages 97-99, it shows what type of transactions qualify as “unique transactions.” The transactions I have had to show ID for at your establishment do not fall into the “unque transactons” listed on pages 97-99.

Now moving to page 131 is the “honor all cards” rule which states that a merchant cannot have a policy in place that discriminates against customers who pay with a Card. By requiring customers who are paying with a Card to show ID, you are discriminating against a customer who pays with a Card by requiring them to present identification which you do not have non-Card customers do.

Also on page 131 is the “cardholder identification” rule which states that a merchant may not refuse to complete a transaction solely because a cardholder has refused to provide additional identification.

Also on MasterCard’s website is a “Contact Us” page that records reports of merchants who are not following their terms which can be found here: http://www.mastercard.com/us/personal/en/contactus/merchantviolations.html

Better link for Visa top link http://usa.visa.com/merchants/risk_management/card_present.html

thelowpriceleader | August 5, 2008

Better link for Visa top link

http://usa.visa.com/merchants/risk_management/card_present.html

Leave a comment

You can use these tags : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Twitter


follow jja0 at http://twitter.com

Recent Comments

  • SouthernGent on “Expect More, Pay Less”
  • Heather Alvarez on Some Explanation Necessary
  • Ashley Tate on Some Explanation Necessary
  • ME on Some Explanation Necessary
  • Catherine Bray on Some Explanation Necessary

Blogroll

  • The Southern Gentleman
  • Tony McCollum’s Weblog
  • Vanity Fair

Family

  • AdoptBlogger.com
  • BigMucho!

Politics

  • Daily Kos
  • Drudge Report

Popular

  • James Berardinelli’s Reelviews
  • The Internet Movie Database

Social

  • JohnA On Facebook
  • JohnA On LinkedIn
  • JohnA On MySpace

Archives

  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox